Barreling Towards “Significant Misalignment”: A Comparative Examination of AI Regulation In The European Union And United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/pur.2025.111Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, European Union, United States, PolicyAbstract
As artificial intelligence technologies threaten drastic change, governments around the world have implemented different strategies regarding their regulation. Despite the European Union and United States’ strong diplomatic and military alliance, dynamic trade relationship, and broadly aligned commitment to liberal democracy, the two powers have taken drastically different regulatory approaches to AI. In this paper, I conduct a comparative qualitative analysis of the defining characteristics of each government’s AI policies and how their actions reflect different strategies to become a global leader in the AI revolution. In general, the EU emphasizes regulation, while the U.S. emphasizes innovation and military action as means to grow and wield global influence. While the EU takes a heavy-handed approach through comprehensive and binding legislation, aiming to lead the world in laying down AI law, the U.S. has not passed equivalent federal legislation, opting for a hands-off approach and emphasizing investment in innovation to assert dominance. Both governments’ policies suffer from fragmentation along different dimensions. I will consider the possible explanations for why these records differ, including differences in the actors’ 1) fundamental approaches to regulation and strategies for global leadership on AI; 2) regulatory capacities; and 3) legislative agenda-setting, political polarization, and gridlock. Ultimately, considering the EU and U.S. predominance on the global stage, the direction of their strategies and level of cooperation could shape the future of AI.
References
AI Watch: Global regulatory tracker - United States | White & Case LLP. (2024, May 13). www.whitecase.com. https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-global-regulatory-tracker-united-states#:~:text=A s%20noted%20above%2C%20there%20is
Allyn, B. (2024, September 29). California Gov. Newsom vetoes AI safety bill that divided Silicon Valley. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2024/09/20/nx-s1-5119792/newsom-ai-bill-california-sb1047-tech
Altman, Sam. “Who Will Control the Future of AI?” Washington Post, The Washington Post, 25 July 2024, www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/07/25/sam-altman-ai-democracy-authoritarianism-future/.
American Data Privacy and Protection Act, H.R. 8152, 117th Cong. (2022). https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8152/cosponsors.
American Privacy Rights Act of 2024, H.R. 8818, 118th Cong. (2024).
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/8818/text?s=1&r=1&q=%7B%22search%22%3A %22American+Privacy+Rights+Act%22%7D.
Apple. (2024, January 25). Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union. Apple Newsroom. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/01/apple-announces-changes-to-ios-safari-and-the-app-store-in-the -european-union/
Atkinson, R. (2020). Understanding the U.S. National Innovation System, 2020. Itif.org. https://itif.org/publications/2020/11/02/understanding-us-national-innovation-system-2020/
Badlam, J., Clark, S., Gajendragadkar, S., Kumar, A., O’Rourke, S., & Swartz, D. (2022, October 4). The CHIPS and Science Act: What is it and what is in it? McKinsey & Company.
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/the-chips-and-science act-heres-whats-in-it
Bekzod, Z. (2021, June 25). Building the Future: How China and Russia Promote AI Development. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/building-future-how-china-and-russia-promote-ai-development-18848 5/
Bond, J., Fleisher, R., Cohen, J. (2015). Presidential-Congressional Relations in an Era of Polarized Parties and a 60-Vote Senate. In American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, James A. Thurber and Antoine Yoshinaka, eds. Cambridge University Press.
Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2013). Why Hasn’t Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.103
Bradford, A. (2012). The Brussels Effect. Papers.ssrn.com. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2770634
Bradford, A. (2023, September 1). Whose AI Revolution? | by Anu Bradford. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/ai-regulation-us-eu-china-challenges-opportunities-by-anu-bradf ord-2023-09
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2012/oj.
Chen, H., & Magramo, K. (2024, February 4). Finance worker pays out $25 million after video call with deepfake “chief financial officer.” CNN.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/04/asia/deepfake-cfo-scam-hong-kong-intlhnk/index.html
Clark, J. (2023, November 2). DOD Releases AI Adoption Strategy. U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3578219/dod-releases-ai-adoption-strategy/
Clark, J., & Gillian, H. (2019, December 11). Regulatory Markets for AI Safety. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.00078
Commerce Dems. (2024, June 11). Hearing: The Need to Protect Americans’ Privacy and the AI Accelerant [Video].
Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/live/b_D47iak2uA?si=Um51iqw9XLLtMC9n
Cupać, J & Sienknecht, M. (2024). Regulate against the machine: how the EU mitigates AI harm to democracy. Democratization, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2024.2353706
Congressional Research Service. (2023, August 4). “Artificial Intelligence: Overview, Recent Advances, and Considerations for the 118th Congress.” https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47644.
Defense Innovation Official Says Replicator Initiative Remains On Track. (2024). U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3657609/
Durbin, R. & Graham, L. (n.d.). The DEFIANCE Act of 2024. https://www.durbin.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/defiance_act_of_2024.pdf
Engler, A. (2023, April 25). The EU and U.S. diverge on AI regulation: A transatlantic comparison and steps to alignment. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-eu-and-us-diverge-on-ai-regulation-a-transatlantic-comparison-andsteps-to-alignment/
European Commission. (2020, February 19). White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: a European Approach to Excellence and Trust. Commission.europa.eu.
https://commission.europa.eu/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellenc e-and-trust_en
European Commission. (2021, March 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI | Shaping Europe’s digital future. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
European Commission. (2022). The Digital Services Act package | Shaping Europe’s digital future.
Digital-Strategy.ec.europa.eu; European Commission.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package
European Commission. (2024, September). The future of European competitiveness.
https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/97e481fd-2dc3-412d-be4c-f152a8232961_en?filename= The%20future%20of%20European%20competitiveness%20_%20A%20competitiveness%20strategy%20fo r%20Europe.pdf.
Exec. Order No. 13859. (2019). https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2023-24283
Exec. Order No. 13960. (2020). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/08/2020-27065/promoting-the-use-of-trustworthy-artifi cial-intelligence-in-the-federal-government
Exec. Order No. 14110. (2023). https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2023-24283
Faverio, M., & Tyson, A. (2023, November 21). What the data says about Americans’ views of artificial intelligence. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/11/21/what-the-data-says-about-americans-views-of-artifici al-intelligence/#:~:text=Pew%20Research%20Center%20surveys%20show
Feathers, T. (2024, September 26). Man Behind Biden Deepfake Robocalls Hit With $6 Million Fine. Gizmodo. https://gizmodo.com/man-behind-biden-deepfake-robocalls-hit-with-6-million-fine-2000504021
Ferejohn, J., & Shipan, C. (1990). Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6(special), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/6.special_issue.1
Field, H. (2024, February 9). How Walmart, Delta, Chevron and Starbucks are using AI to monitor employee messages. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/09/ai-might-be-reading-your-slack-teams-messages-using-tech-from-aware.html
Gallup. (2019, January 16). Most Important Problem. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1675/most-important-problem.aspx
Guerini, R. (2024). In AI funding and research, China and US outperform Europe. Science|Business. https://sciencebusiness.net/news/ai-funding-and-research-china-and-us-outperform-europe#:~:text=Accordi ng%20to%20the%20report%20published
Hahm, H., Hilpert, D., & König, T. (2022). Divided by Europe: affective polarisation in the context of European elections. West European Politics, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2133277
Hamilton, D.S. and Quinlan, J.P. (2023). The Transatlantic Economy 2023. Daniel S. Hamilton. https://transatlanticrelations.org/publications/transatlantic-economy-2023/.
Hartig, H. (2022, May 6). Wide partisan gaps in abortion attitudes, but opinions in both parties are complicated. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/05/06/wide-partisan-gaps-in-abortion-attitudes-but-opinions -in-both-parties-are-complicated/
Henshall, W. (2024, March 27). U.S. Military Spending on AI Surges. TIME. https://time.com/6961317/ai-artificial-intelligence-us-military-spending/
Hirsh, M. (2023, April 11). How AI will revolutionize warfare. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/04/11/ai-arms-race-artificial-intelligence-chatgpt-military-technology/
Howe, A. (2024, June 28). Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal agencies.
SCOTUSblog. https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-age ncies/
Howell, W., Adler, S., Cameron, C., Riemann, C. (2000). Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–94. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25(2), 285–312.
Jacob, M. S., Lee, B. E., & Gratton, G. (2024). From Gridlock to Polarization. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4521276
Kazim, E., Güçlütürk, O., Almeida, D., Kerrigan, C., Lomas, E., Koshiyama, A., Hilliard, A., & Trengove, M. (2022). Proposed EU AI Act—Presidency compromise text: select overview and comment on the changes to the proposed regulation. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00179-z
Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Saks, E. (2023, February 15). Public Awareness of Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Activities. Pew Research Center Science & Society.
Kerry, C. F. (2024, August 29). The good, the not-so-good, and the ugly of the UN’s blueprint for AI. Brookings.
_campaign=Brookings%20Brief&utm_medium=email&utm_content=322510890&utm_source=hs_email
König, T. (2007). Divergence or convergence? From ever-growing to ever-slowing European legislative decision making. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 417–444.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00648.x-i1
Konaev, M. et al. (2023, August). U.S. and Chinese Military AI Purchases. Center for Security and Emerging Technology. https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/u-s-and-chinese-military-ai-purchases/.
Lawrence, C., Cui, I., Ho, D. (2022) Implementation Challenges to Three Pillars of America’s AI Strategy. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.
https://dho.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/AI_Implementation.pdf.
Legislative Productivity of the EU, 2004-2019 | Dimiter Toshkov. (n.d.). Dimiter.eu. http://dimiter.eu/Visualizations_files/Eurlex2019.html#:~:text=In%20conclusion%2C%20the%20legislativ e%20ouput
Lonas, L. (2023, August 27). Republicans want to eliminate the Education Department. What would that look like? The Hill.
https://thehill.com/homenews/education/4171756-2024-republicans-want-to-eliminate-the-education-depart ment-what-would-that-look-like/
Lu, M. (2024, April 24). Visualizing AI Patents by Country. Visual Capitalist. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-ai-patents-by-country/
Mozur, P., & Satariano, A. (2024, July 2). A.I. Begins Ushering In an Age of Killer Robots. The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/technology/ukraine-war-ai-weapons.html
Mueller, B. (2021, May 4). The Artificial Intelligence Act: A Quick Explainer. Center for Data Innovation. https://datainnovation.org/2021/05/the-artificial-intelligence-act-a-quick-explainer/
Mulligan, S. J. (2024, September 18). There are more than 120 AI bills in Congress right now. MIT Technology Review; MIT Technology Review.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/09/18/1104015/here-are-all-the-ai-bills-in-congress-right-now/
National Office of Standards and Technology. (2023) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
NATO. (2024, July 10). Summary of NATO’s revised Artificial Intelligence (AI) strategy. NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_227237.htm
NBC News. (2018, April 10). Senator Asks How Facebook Remains Free, Mark Zuckerberg Smirks: ‘We Run Ads’ | NBC News [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2H8wx1aBiQ
Ng, A. (2024, September 18). State by state, one lobbyist is reshaping American tech laws. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/09/17/andrew-kingman-data-privacy-lobbying-00179630
O’Brien, M., & Parvini, S. (2025, January 23). Trump signs executive order on developing AI “free from ideological bias.” AP News.
Ortutay, B. (2024, July 21). What to Know about the Kids Online Safety Act and Its Chances of Passing. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/congress-social-media-kosa-kids-online-safety-act-parents-ead646422cf84cef0d 0573c3c841eb6d
Parker, L. (2022). National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology Inaugural Stakeholder Meeting.
Plotinsky, D., & Cinelli, G. M. (2024, April 9). Existing and Proposed Federal AI Regulation in the United States. Www.morganlewis.com. https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2024/04/existing-and-proposed-federal-ai-regulation-in-the-united-stat es
Polyakova, A. (2023, March 27). Summit for Democracy 2023: How the U.S. Can Lead on Tech Regulation. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/27/democracy-summit-tech-regulations-tiktok-chatgpt-ai/
Preliminary Survey Results: US and European Publics Overwhelmingly and Increasingly Agree That AI Needs to Be Managed Carefully | GovAI Blog. (n.d.). www.governance.ai.
https://www.governance.ai/post/increasing-consensus-ai-requires-careful-management
Regulation 1689/2024. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act).
http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Regulation 2065/2022. Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
Regulation 679/2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).
http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/2016-05-04
Reiljan, A. (2019). “Fear and loathing across party lines” (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12351
Rep. Massie Introduces Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act to “End the Fed.” (2024, May 16). Congressman Thomas Massie. https://massie.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=395644
Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Hine, E., Mazzi, F., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Achieving a “Good AI Society”: Comparing the Aims and Progress of the EU and the US. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(6).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00340-7
Rowlands, C. L. (2024, April 29). We Need To Rewild The Internet. Longreads. https://longreads.com/2024/04/29/we-need-to-rewild-the-internet/
Smuha, N. A. (2019). From a “Race to AI” to a “Race to AI Regulation” - Regulatory Competition for Artificial Intelligence. SSRN Electronic Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501410
Stanford University. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/HAI_AI-Index-Report-2024.pdf
The Bipartisan Senate AI Working Group. (2024, May). Driving U.S. Innovation in Artificial Intelligence. https://www.schumer.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Roadmap_Electronic1.32pm.pdf.
The European Commission. A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines. (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/ai_hleg_definition_of_ai_18_december_1.pdf
The White House. (2023, July 21). FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Secures Voluntary Commitments from Leading Artificial Intelligence Companies to Manage the Risks Posed by AI. The White House.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-adminis tration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks -posed-by-ai/
The White House. (2023, October 30). FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issue s-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/
Three things to know about the White House’s executive order on AI. (n.d.). MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/30/1082678/three-things-to-know-about-the-white-houses-exe cutive-order-on-ai/
“Timeline - Artificial Intelligence.” Consilium, 2024, www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/artificial-intelligence/timeline-artificial-intelligence/.
Tuholski, A. (2018). Institutional Gridlock in the United States Congress. DeVry University Journal of Scholarly Research, 4(1), 15–26. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/570d2d16d210b8f533d3b468/t/5c75fd0f8165f58a82b6778d/1551236
/Institutional+Gridlock+in+the+United+States+Congress.pdf
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Digital Divide: Impact of Access. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043
Wagner, A. (2024, March 26). A Tale of Two Policies: The EU AI Act and the U.S. AI Executive Order in Focus. Trilligent. https://trilligent.com/a-tale-of-two-policies-the-eu-ai-act-and-the-us-ai-executive-order-in-focus/#:~:text=T he%20EU%20has%20established%20a
Warburton, M., & Levine, A. J. (2024, March 12). Congress is getting less productive. Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-CONGRESS/PRODUCTIVITY/egpbabmkwvq/
Weatherbed, J. (2024, July 18). Meta won’t release its multimodal Llama AI model in the EU. The Verge; The Verge.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/7/18/24201041/meta-multimodal-llama-ai-model launch-eu-regulations
Werkmeister, D. C., Ehlen, T., Riede, L., Roos, P., Lopez, V. G., & Fischer, V. (2024, July 4). EU AI Act unpacked #9: Who are the regulators to enforce the AI Act? Lexology; Freshfields.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bc9a0418-140e-45be-bf2d-a788ee93ce83
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022) Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American People.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Blueprint-for-an-AI-Bill-of-Rights.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Samantha Podnar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
- The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.
