A Muse of Astronomy

Defining Creativity in Ancient Greece

Authors

  • Noah Knishkowy University of Pittsburgh (undergraduate student)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/pur.2024.47

Keywords:

muse, muses, creativity, ancient greece, urania, poetry, divine inspiration

Abstract

The ancient Greek Muses were deities credited with divine inspiration of poets and others, enabling those mortals to create great works in their field. This inspiration, sometimes temporary and sometimes permanent, could either grant an individual a divine level of talent, or give access to knowledge that was otherwise unknowable, all in order to enhance the mortal’s craft. Divinely inspired creation was generally perceived as a collaborative process, involving contribution by both the mortal (accumulating skill and knowledge over their lifetime) and the Muse (granting divine inspiration). With 9 Muses, each overseeing a different realm, it may seem surprising that astronomy (manifested as the goddess Urania) is included alongside arts such as epic poetry, tragic theater and choral music. However, upon further examination of both primary and secondary sources, the boundary between art and science that exists in the present day was not present in ancient Greek society. Instead, realms of knowledge as diverse as astronomy, history, and dance were thought to involve both reason and creativity, represented by mortal technical skill and divine inspiration, respectively. Only with both elements, believed the ancient Greeks, could a mortal produce something truly great.

References

Antcliffe, Herbert. “Music in the Life of the Ancient Greeks.” The Musical Quarterly 16, no. 2 (1930): 263–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/738451.

Avni, Abraham. “Inspiration in Plato and the Hebrew Prophets.” Comparative Literature 20, no. 1 (1968): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1769806.

Budin, Stephanie. “A Reconsideration of the Aphrodite-Ashtart Syncretism.” Numen 51, no. 2 (2004): 95–145. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852704323056643.

Diodorus Siculus. Library of History, vol. II. Translated by C.H. Oldfather. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935. Bill Thayer’s Web Site. Accessed December 15, 2023. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diodorus_Siculus/4A*.html.

Hesiod. Theogony. In Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns, and Homerica. Translated by H.G. Evelyn-White. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914. Perseus Digital Library. Accessed December 10, 2023. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0130.

Ledbetter, Grace M. Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825288.

Maurizio, Lisa. “Anthropology and Spirit Possession: A Reconsideration of the Pythia’s Role at Delphi.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 115 (1995): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/631644.

Murray, Penelope. “The Muses and Their Arts.” In Music and the Muses. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242399.003.0014.

Murray, Penelope. “Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 101 (1981): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/629846.

Pausanias. Description of Greece. Translated by W.H.S. Jones and H.A. Ormerod. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918. Perseus Digital Library. Accessed December 10, 2023. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0160.

Paxson, Thomas D. “Art and Paideia.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 19, no. 1 (1985): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332559.

Rigsby, Kent J. “A Decree of Haliartus on Cult.” The American Journal of Philology 108, no. 4 (1987): 729–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/294796.

Simpson, Thomas K. “The Museum as Grove of the Muses.” The Journal of Museum Education 25, no. 1/2 (2000): 28–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40479178.

University of Warwick Department of Classics and Ancient History. “Sanctuary of the Muses at Thespiai.” Classics and Ancient History. Accessed November 9, 2023. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/classics/intranets/students/modules/greekreligion/database2/muses/.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-12

How to Cite

Knishkowy, N. (2024). A Muse of Astronomy: Defining Creativity in Ancient Greece. Pittsburgh Undergraduate Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/pur.2024.47

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Pittsburgh Undergraduate Review

Section

Research

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Noah Knishkowy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
  9. The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.